Be careful with your syntax

Before

Ten of the eleven nominees for election to our Board are not employees of our company. Jane Smith, our current Chief Executive Officer, is both an employee of our company and a nominee for election. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of our ten non-employee director nominees does not have a material relationship with us and is independent under NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules. None of our directors or executive officers has any family relationship with any other director or executive officer.

Before, with commentary

Ten of the eleven nominees for election to our Board are not employees of our company. [“Ten nominees…are not” is technically okay, but wouldn’t it be better to say what they are—independent—which is the whole point?] Jane Smith, our current Chief Executive Officer, is both an employee of our company and a nominee for election. [Again, not technically wrong, but repetitive and stilted.] Our Board of Directors has determined that each of our ten non-employee director nominees does not have [this is definitely wrong] a material relationship with us and is independent under NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules. None of our directors or executive officers has any family relationship with any other director or executive officer.

After

All of the nominees for election to the Board, other than Jane Smith, our current Chief Executive Officer, are independent. The Board of Directors has determined that no non‑employee director nominee has a material relationship with us, and that all ten are independent under NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules. No director or executive officer has any family relationship with any other director or executive officer.

(My version reads better and uses 19 fewer words.)